Design approaches for additive manufactured components, with a focus on selective laser melting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23998/rm.64915Avainsanat:
additive manufacturing (AM), selective laser melting (SLM), design, lattice, topology optimization, parts consolidation, process simulation, 3D printingAbstrakti
Additive manufacturing (AM) of metal components is characterized by the joining of material particles or feedstock to make parts described by 3D model data in typically a layer by layer fashion [1]. These modern and constantly improving manufacturing techniques inherently allow far more geometric freedom than traditional “subtractive” manufacturing processes, and thus necessitate novel approaches to component design. Careful utilization of this geometric freedom can be translated into products characterized by improved functionality and performance, simplified assemblies, are customizable, and/or lightweight [2-5]. This paper provides a brief overview design approaches, manufacturing limitations, and available tools for successful design of additive manufactured components, with special attention paid to the selective laser melting (SLM) approach.
Lähdeviitteet
2017.
[2] M.K. Thompson, et al. Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities,
considerations, and constraints, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 6:737-760,
2016.
[3] W. Gao, et al. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering,
Computer-Aided Design, 69:65-89, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001
[4] C. Emmelmann, D. Herzon, and J. Kranz. ”Design for laser additive manufacturing” in
Laser Additive Manufacturing, M. Brandt Ed. Woodhead, pp. 259-279, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00010-5
[5] B.H. Jared, et al. Additive manufacturing: Toward holistic design, Scripta Materialia,
135:141-147, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.02.029
[6] T. Primo, et al. Additive manufacturing integration with topology optimization
methodology for innovative product design, The International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, 2017. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0112-9.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0112-9
[7] Y. Saadlaoui. Topology optimization and additive manufacturing: Comparison of
conception methods using industrial codes, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 43:1:178-
186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.03.006
[8] E. Komi. Design for additive manufacturing, VTT-R-03159-16, VTT, 2016.
[9] Y. Tang, S. Yang, and Y.F. Zhao. “Sustainable design for additive manufacturing through
functionality integration and part consolidation” in Handbook of
Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing, S.S. Muthu and M.M Savalani, Ed. Springer,
Hong Kong, pp. 101-141, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0549-7_6
[10] Yang, S., Tang, Y., Zhao, Y.F. A new part consolidation method to embrace the design
freedom of additive manufacturing, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 20: 444-449,
2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.06.024
[11] S. Tammas-Williams and I. Todd. Design for additive manufacturing with site-specific
properties in metals and alloys, Scripta Materialia, 135:105-110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.030
[12] A.E. Pawlowski, et al. Damage-tolerant metallic composites via melt infiltration of
additively manufactured preforms, Materials & Design, 125:346-351, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.072
[13] P. Kokkonen, et al. Design guide for additive manufacturing of metal components by SLM
process, VTT-R-02160-16, VTT, 2016.
Tiedostolataukset
Julkaistu
Numero
Osasto
Lisenssi
Copyright (c) 2017 Erin Komi, Petteri Kokkonen
Tämä työ on lisensoitu Creative Commons Nimeä-JaaSamoin 4.0 Kansainvälinen Julkinen-lisenssillä.
